January 2025 feels like it's lasted about 27 years, but somehow, there’s still an entire year ahead of us. As always, Apple is poised to make the rest of the year incredibly busy with a flurry of new product releases. While new iPhones are a given, they’re just the tip of the iceberg. According to various rumors, reports, and industry analysts, Apple is planning to refresh almost every device in its portfolio in 2025, from iPhones and iPads to Macs, wearables, and even entirely new product categories.

Let’s take a deep dive into what Apple is rumored to be working on for 2025, analyzing the potential impact of these products and what they could mean for the tech giant’s ecosystem.

1. iPhone 17 Series: A New Era for iPhones

Apple’s iPhone releases have become a September tradition, and 2025 will be no exception. However, this year’s lineup could bring some significant changes.

• iPhone 17, 17 Pro, and 17 Pro Max: The standard iPhone 17 models are expected to feature incremental upgrades, such as improved cameras, faster processors (likely the A19 chip), and enhanced AI capabilities. The Pro models, on the other hand, could push the boundaries further with advanced display technology, possibly under-display Face ID, and even more powerful chipsets. These devices will likely continue Apple’s focus on computational photography and augmented reality (AR) experiences.

• iPhone 17 Air: One of the most intriguing rumors is the potential launch of a thinner iPhone 17 Air model. At around 5 to 6mm thick, it would be the thinnest iPhone ever, with a possible 6.6-inch display. However, this focus on thinness may come with compromises, such as a shorter battery life and only one rear camera lens. Despite these trade-offs, the iPhone 17 Air could be positioned as the most expensive variant in the lineup, catering to those who prioritize sleek design over functionality. This move could signal Apple’s attempt to create a new premium tier within its iPhone lineup.

2. iPhone SE (2025): A Budget-Friendly Powerhouse

The iPhone SE has always been Apple’s answer to budget-conscious consumers, and 2025 could bring a major redesign.

• Face ID Replaces Touch ID: For the first time, the iPhone SE is expected to phase out Touch ID in favor of Face ID, bringing it in line with Apple’s flagship models. This change would modernize the SE lineup and make it more competitive in the mid-range market.

• Apple Intelligence Features: The new SE is also rumored to support Apple Intelligence features, making it a more capable device for AI-driven tasks. This could include enhanced Siri functionality, on-device machine learning, and improved photo and video processing.

• Notch Instead of Dynamic Island: Interestingly, display analyst Ross Young suggests that Apple will stick with the notch design rather than adopting the Dynamic Island for the SE. This decision may help keep costs down while still offering a modern look.

• Spring Launch: According to reports, the new iPhone SE is expected to launch in spring 2025, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers.

3. Apple Glass (AR Glasses): The Next Big Thing?

One of the most anticipated products in Apple’s pipeline is its AR glasses, which could finally debut in 2025.

• Seamless AR Integration: The glasses are expected to overlay digital information onto the real world, enhancing navigation, gaming, and productivity. This could revolutionize how we interact with technology, making AR more accessible and practical for everyday use.

• Lightweight Design: Apple is rumored to be working on a sleek, lightweight design that’s comfortable for all-day wear. This would be a critical factor in ensuring widespread adoption.

• iOS Integration: The glasses are expected to work seamlessly with iPhones, iPads, and other Apple devices, further solidifying Apple’s ecosystem.

4. M4 and M5 Chips: Powering the Future

Apple’s silicon team is reportedly working on the next generation of processors, which could bring significant performance and efficiency improvements.

• M4 Chip: Likely to debut in 2024, the M4 could power updated Macs and iPads in 2025 with even greater performance and efficiency. This chip could focus on enhancing AI and machine learning capabilities, making it ideal for creative professionals and developers.

• M5 Chip: Rumors suggest the M5 could introduce a new architecture, focusing on AI and machine learning capabilities. This chip could power high-end devices like the MacBook Pro and iPad Pro, offering unparalleled performance for demanding tasks.

5. Foldable iPhone or iPad: A New Form Factor

Apple has been exploring foldable technology for years, and 2025 might be the year we see it.

• Foldable iPhone: A foldable iPhone with a flexible OLED display could offer a compact form factor that unfolds into a tablet-like experience. This would allow users to enjoy the benefits of a larger screen without sacrificing portability.

• Foldable iPad: Alternatively, Apple might debut a foldable iPad, combining the portability of a tablet with the functionality of a larger screen. This could appeal to professionals who need a versatile device for work and creativity.

6. Apple Car (Project Titan): The Ultimate Ecosystem Device

Apple’s long-rumored electric vehicle, codenamed Project Titan, could finally launch in 2025.

• Autonomous Driving: Advanced self-driving capabilities powered by Apple’s custom AI and sensor technology.

• Seamless Ecosystem Integration: The car is expected to integrate with the Apple ecosystem, offering features like hands-free Siri, Apple Music, and more.

• Sleek Design: Apple’s design ethos will likely result in a minimalist, futuristic vehicle.

7. Apple Watch Ultra 3, Series 11, and SE

Apple’s wearable lineup is also expected to see significant updates in 2025.

• Apple Watch Ultra 3: Rumors suggest it could feature a new low-power OLED display, advanced blood pressure monitoring, and satellite connectivity.

• Apple Watch Series 11: Expected to inherit some of the Ultra 3’s features, such as the new display technology and blood pressure monitoring.

• Apple Watch SE: A redesigned SE with thinner bezels and a more modern design.

8. Other Devices We Might See

• HomePod with Display: A new HomePod with a 6 or 7-inch display and Apple Intelligence support.

• Revamped AirTag: Better range, more precise tracking, and a new battery.

• AirPods Pro (3rd Generation): Improved sound quality, active noise cancellation, and heart rate monitoring.

• Refreshed Apple TV and HomePod Mini: New chips for improved performance, Wi-Fi 6E support, and better sound quality.

Final Thoughts

2025 could be a landmark year for Apple, with the potential launch of groundbreaking products like the Apple Glass, foldable devices, and the Apple Car. These innovations could redefine Apple’s ecosystem and solidify its position as a leader in the tech industry. As always, the tech world will be watching closely to see how these rumors translate into reality.

What are you most excited about? Let us know in the comments!

 Today, January 20, Donald Trump will officially be sworn in for his second term as President of the United States, marking the start of another controversial chapter in American political history. This highly anticipated event follows a turbulent first term marked by two impeachments and a contentious election season.

Who Will Be Attending the Ceremony?

The inauguration will see the presence of former Presidents Joe Biden, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, along with former First Ladies and other prominent political figures. International leaders are also expected to attend, including Argentine President Javier Milei, while others, like Chinese President Xi Jinping, will send official envoys.

Adding a unique flavor to this year’s ceremony, tech moguls such as Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Sam Altman will be among the high-profile guests in attendance.

How to Watch the Event Live

• Time: 12:00 PM EST
• TV Broadcasts: Major networks like ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, NBC, PBS, and CSPAN will provide live coverage.
• Online Streaming: Tune into platforms such as YouTube (ABC, PBS NewsHour, USA TODAY), NBC News Now, and the official White House website for real-time updates.

What Comes Next?

Following the oath of office, President Trump will immediately gain executive powers, including the ability to sign executive orders and implement new policies. Key priorities during the early days of his term are expected to include trade, immigration, and environmental policy.

Experts anticipate swift action on several fronts, with some policies designed for immediate impact while others aim to set the tone for the administration’s broader agenda. Additionally, the President will have the authority to grant executive clemency, paving the way for potential pardons.

What are your thoughts on this historic day? Share your views and join the conversation!

 In his analysis of President Joe Biden’s economic policies, Fareed Zakaria presents a compelling argument: despite bold interventionist measures, these strategies have largely failed to resonate with America’s working class. While Biden’s administration has poured billions into infrastructure, manufacturing, and clean energy, the political dividends among the working-class demographic remain elusive. So why hasn’t economic interventionism delivered the intended results?

The Promise of Economic Interventionism

From the outset, Biden positioned himself as a champion of the working class. His economic agenda included sweeping investments in public infrastructure and manufacturing through bills like the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. These measures were designed to create jobs, bolster domestic industries, and rebuild the middle class, particularly in regions hit hardest by globalization and deindustrialization.

By advocating for a “Made in America” approach, Biden sought to reverse decades of economic decline in industrial areas. The administration’s push for green energy projects also aimed to modernize the economy while creating blue-collar jobs in emerging industries. The strategy appeared sound on paper: inject resources into struggling communities and address both economic and environmental concerns simultaneously.

The Disconnect Between Policy and Perception

Despite these ambitious efforts, many working-class voters remain unconvinced. Zakaria highlights several reasons for this disconnect:

1. Cultural and Political Polarization: The working class, particularly in rural and industrial regions, has increasingly aligned with the Republican Party, driven by cultural and identity-based issues rather than economic policy. Biden’s policies, no matter how impactful, struggle to break through these entrenched divides.

2. Messaging Challenges: Biden’s administration has faced criticism for failing to effectively communicate the benefits of its economic initiatives. Complex policies often feel distant and abstract to the average voter, overshadowed by simpler, more emotionally resonant messages from opponents.

3. Lingering Distrust: Decades of perceived neglect by political elites have fostered deep skepticism among the working class. Even when tangible progress occurs, many are hesitant to attribute it to government intervention, let alone embrace the party responsible.

The Shadow of Trump’s Populism

A significant obstacle to Biden’s outreach efforts is the enduring influence of Donald Trump. Trump’s populist rhetoric, centered on “America First” and a rejection of globalism, continues to resonate deeply with working-class voters. While Biden’s policies aim to deliver long-term economic benefits, Trump’s messaging taps into immediate emotions of frustration and disillusionment.

Moreover, Trump’s ability to frame Biden’s agenda as “socialist” or harmful to traditional industries further undermines its appeal. This perception, amplified by conservative media, creates a formidable barrier for Biden to overcome.

The Broader Lessons for Policymakers

Zakaria’s critique underscores an important reality: economic interventionism alone is insufficient to win back the working class. Policymakers must complement these efforts with a robust strategy to address cultural concerns and rebuild trust. Key takeaways include:

• Simplify Messaging: Economic policies need to be framed in relatable, impactful terms. Highlighting individual success stories and emphasizing tangible outcomes can make initiatives more accessible and persuasive.

• Bridge the Cultural Divide: Engaging directly with working-class communities on their cultural and social concerns is vital. Economic prosperity must be coupled with a sense of respect and inclusion.

• Long-Term Commitment: Rebuilding trust takes time. Sustained investment and consistent outreach are necessary to demonstrate genuine commitment to these communities.

Conclusion

Fareed Zakaria’s analysis serves as a sobering reminder of the complexities inherent in modern American politics. While Biden’s economic interventionism represents a bold and necessary step, it has yet to translate into political capital among the working class. The path forward requires not only economic policies that deliver results but also a deeper understanding of the cultural and emotional factors that shape voter behavior. Only by addressing these multidimensional challenges can leaders hope to bridge the divide and truly reconnect with America’s working class.

Neil Sedaka: The man behind the music

 Neil Sedaka: 'I think the songs will outlive me—It's a form of immortality.'

An ACLU lawyer, Lee Gelernt, told the hosts of "CNN This Morning" that people are "overstating what's happening at the border."

"From a public policy, you can’t misuse public health. It was not intended to regulate the border. I also think people are overstating what’s happening at the border. If you close the border for so long, of course, there’s going to be a temporary influx of people, but ultimately, it’ll even out, and the federal government has more than enough resources to deal with this," Gelernt said.

Gelernt also said that Title 42 was acting as a "crutch" and that the Biden administration has "not been great" on the border, adding that it was "troubling." 

MSNBC's Chris Hayes, who also interviewed Gelernt on Tuesday, said during the interview that Title 42 was just a "way of avoiding the issue."

"It just seems like a way of avoiding the issue, and trying to, I don’t know what, strong arm the administration into keeping this Trump policy, but it just seems like a failure in every direction," he said. 

Earlier this year Libs of TikTok‘s identity was doxxed by the despicable Taylor Lorenz and the Washington Post. For that reason I’ve never used her real name on TRS even though it does show up in a few tweets we’ve posted (unavoidable).

Recently she went on Tucker’s show to reveal herself to the world and also revealed something that was absolutely amazing about Governor Ron DeSantis:

Carlson released an interview on Tuesday with Chaya Raichik, the creator of Libs of TikTok, a right-wing Twitter account that aggregates social media videos primarily from LGBTQ users who work in the education system, with the intention of framing LGBTQ acceptance as a symptom of America’s moral decline. It was an unsettling conversation, to say the least. Raichik’s rhetoric during her interview with Carlson — the first major in-person media interview she’s done as the creator of Libs of TikTok — was so extreme one can’t help but feel that the hard-won progress on LGBTQ acceptance is rapidly unraveling.

“The LGTBQ community has become this cult, and it’s so captivating, and it pulls people in so strongly, unlike anything we’ve ever seen,” she told a rapt Carlson, explaining what she thinks motivates gender-affirming surgery for minors. “They brainwash people to join, and they convince them of all these things, and it’s really, really hard to get out of it … it’s extremely poisonous.”

Carlson didn’t respond by asking Raichik if she was, even by the standards of today’s traditionalist right, using too broad of a brush by calling the entire LGBTQ community a cult. Instead he asked her whether she believed there was a “spiritual component” to the issue. 

After some initial hesitation, Raichik ventured a theory: “I think they’re evil. Sometimes we try to break it down a lot and you know we discuss why this is happening ... I think sometimes the simplest answer is they’re just evil, they’re bad people, they’re just evil people, and they want to groom kids.”

Carlson responded affirmatively, with a quiet “yeah.”

Raichik’s language deserves condemnation for a number of reasons. She is demonizing and fabricating dangerous theories about marginalized communities badly in need of protection. She’s conflating alternative sexual orientation and gender identity with sexual abuse. And strikingly, she’s using trans identity writ large as a springboard to launch attacks on the entire LGBTQ community.

Carlson made it plain he was there to assist her in her efforts. He framed her aggregation of videos showing elementary school teachers talking about their personal pronouns as hard-hitting investigative work. His interview as a whole was designed to paint Raichik as a hero who was doing an invaluable job as a dogged, truth-seeking journalist. The goal was clear: to help supercharge her ultra-reactionary attitude toward gay and trans rights. 

And Raichik’s platform was already highly influential, even without a boost from one of the most widely watched cable news journalists in the country. The stories she disseminates have become agenda-setters within right-wing media ecosystems, and have even directly influenced anti-LGBTQ legislation. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ press secretary has said that Raichik’s platform was integral to “opening her eyes” and shaping her views on Florida’s homophobic education policy known as the “Don’t Say Gay” law. (During the interview with Carlson, Raichik said that DeSantis offered her a place to stay at his guest house after her identity was first revealed by a Washington Post investigation.)

Carlson’s eagerness to give Raichik a platform to spread hatred for an hour on his show on Fox Nation, which is already producing viral video clips on social media, will only help mainstream her further.

 I remember this storm in 1966, I was in Winnipeg, Manitoba. It hit a big swath through Canada and United States. People were tougher back then compared to the scared people today.